General
Moses King, Appellant, v. Sun Printing and Publishing Company, Respondent
179 N.Y. 600·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Moses King, Appellant, v. Sun Printing and Publishing Company, Respondent.
King v. Bun Printing & Publishing Assn., 84 App. Div. 310, affirmed.
(Argued November 14, 1904;
decided November 29, 1904.)
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 22,1903, which affirmed an interlocutory judgment of Special Term sustaining. a demurrer to the complaint.
The following question was certified: “ Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action ? ”
Stillman F. Kneelcmd for appellant.
Franlclin Ba/rtlett for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Werner, JJ.