Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Missouri-Edison Electric Company et al., Petitioners, v. Morgan Jones et al., 1913 — 229 U.S. 615 · caselaw · US
General
Missouri-Edison Electric Company et al., Petitioners, v. Morgan Jones et al.
229 U.S. 615·Supreme Court of the United States·1913
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1059.
Missouri-Edison Electric Company et al., Petitioners, v. Morgan Jones et al.
April 28, 1913.
Mr. H. S. Priest, Mr. B. Schnurmacher and Mr. Wade H. Ellis for the petitioners.
Mr. D. T. Bomar, Mr. Eleneious Smith and Mr. Ford W. Thompson for the respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.