Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
PACIFIC COAST STEAMSHIP COMPANY v. UNITED STATES; SAME v. SAME; SAME v. SAME, 1903 — 187 U.S. 454 · caselaw · US
General
PACIFIC COAST STEAMSHIP COMPANY v. UNITED STATES; SAME v. SAME; SAME v. SAME
187 U.S. 45447 L. Ed. 256·Supreme Court of the United States·1903
The Chief Justice took no part in the decision of these cases.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
PACIFIC COAST STEAMSHIP COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. SAME v. SAME. SAME v. SAME.
APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES EOR THE DISTRICT OE ALASKA.
Nos. 29, 30, 31.
Argued December 8, 1902.
Decided January 5, 1903.
Affirmed on authority of Pacific Steam Whaling Go. v. United. States, decided simultaneously herewith, p. 447, ante.
These cases were argued by the same counsel as in No. 2’6, p. 450, a/nte.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Justice Brewer]
Mr. Justice Brewer
delivered the opinion of the court.
These three cases are substantially similar to the one just decided, and for the reasons stated in the opinion therein the orders of the District Court in each are
Affirmed.
The Chief Justice took no part in the decision of these cases.