Administrative
Edward W. McGinnis et al., Appellants, v. Henry Smythe, Respondent
101 N.Y. 646·New York Court of Appeals·1886·NY
All concur, except Ruder, Ch. J., dissenting, and Rapallo, J., not voting.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Edward W. McGinnis et al., Appellants, v. Henry Smythe, Respondent.
(Argued January 22, 1886;
decided February 9, 1886.)
Decided on the facts.
Norman Melliss for appellants.
E. More for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Earl, J.,]
Earl, J.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur, except Ruder, Ch. J., dissenting, and Rapallo, J., not voting.
Judgment affirmed.