Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Jennie E. Gardinier, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant, 1886 — 103 N.Y. 674 · caselaw · US
Torts · MBE-tested
Jennie E. Gardinier, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant
103 N.Y. 674·New York Court of Appeals·1886·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jennie E. Gardinier, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Argued October 15,1886;
decided November 23, 1886.)
This action was brought to recover damages for alleged negligence causing the death of John H. Gardinier, plaintiff’s intestate.
It was claimed by plaintiff that Gardinier fell over the wing wall of a bridge which defendant had constructed to cony a highway over its tracks near the village of Fonda, and which was not protected by a railing or any sufficient guard. Gardinier was found upon the track below. The court here hold there was no evidence that the deceased fell from, or was upon the bridge, or that he was seen on the highway approaching it. The physician who examined Gardinier after he was found testified that the injury was such as might have been caused , by falling from the abutment of the bridge, or from a car, or by a blow.
C. D. Prescott for appellant.
R. B. Fish for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Danforth, J.,]
Danforth, J.,
reads for reversal and new trial.
All concur.
Judgment reversed. .