Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Howard v. Lyons et al., 1958 — 358 U.S. 914 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Howard v. Lyons et al.
358 U.S. 914·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
December 15, 1958.
No. 57.
Howard v. Lyons et al.
Argued December 8-9, 1958.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Paul A. Sweeney, Morton Hollander and Bernard Cedarbaum for petitioner. Claude L. Dawson for respondents.
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of cases in which orders were this day announced.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari, 357 U. S. 903, to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. This case is restored to the calendar for reargument.