Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Josephine Antoinette Cambreleng, Respondent, v. Ella Ward Graham, Appellant, Impleaded with Douglas Graham et al., Respondents, 1898 — 156 N.Y. 664 · caselaw · US
General
Josephine Antoinette Cambreleng, Respondent, v. Ella Ward Graham, Appellant, Impleaded with Douglas Graham et al., Respondents
156 N.Y. 664·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Josephine Antoinette Cambreleng, Respondent, v. Ella Ward Graham, Appellant, Impleaded with Douglas Graham et al., Respondents.
Qamibreleng v. Graham, 84 Hun, 550, affirmed.
(Submitted May 3, 1898;
decided June 7, 1898.)
Appeal from a final judgment of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 11,1895, after an affirmance by the late General Term thereof, of an interlocutory judgment in partition in favor of plaintiff, by an order made February 15, 1895.
F. R. Coudert, Jr., for appellant.
Henry L. Sprague for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except Parker, Oh. J., not sitting.