Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Siebrand H. Niewenhous, Respondent, v. New York and Harlem Railroad Company et al., Appellants, 1904 — 177 N.Y. 566 · caselaw · US
General
Siebrand H. Niewenhous, Respondent, v. New York and Harlem Railroad Company et al., Appellants
177 N.Y. 566·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Siebrand H. Niewenhous, Respondent, v. New York and Harlem Railroad Company et al., Appellants.
Niewenhous v. N. T. & Harlem B. B. Oo., 76 App. Div. 619, reversed.
(Argued January 12, 1904;
decided January 26,1904.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 14, 1902, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Ira A. Place and Thomas Emery for appellants.
PUny W. WilUamson and George G. Levy for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment reversed and final judgment ordered in favor of defendants, dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint, without costs. The remittitur to be in the form of that in the case of Kriete v. New York and Harlem Railroad Company (175 N. Y. 484); no opinion.
Concur: Pabkeb, Ch. J., O’Bbien, Babtlett, Haight, Mabtin and Cullen, JJ. Not sitting: Gbay, J.