Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of Proving the Last Will and Testament of Roxalana Williams, Deceased; Norman Carpenter, as Executor, etc., Respondent, v. Julius Hall, as Administrator, etc., Appellant, 1894 — 141 N.Y. 572 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of Proving the Last Will and Testament of Roxalana Williams, Deceased; Norman Carpenter, as Executor, etc., Respondent, v. Julius Hall, as Administrator, etc., Appellant
141 N.Y. 572·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Proving the Last Will and Testament of Roxalana Williams, Deceased. Norman Carpenter, as Executor, etc., Respondent, v. Julius Hall, as Administrator, etc., Appellant.
(Argued January 19, 1894;
decided February 6, 1894.)
Appeal 'from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered upon an order made July 2, 1892, which affirmed a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Rensselaer county admitting to probate the will of Roxalana Williams, deceased.-
JR. A. Pa/rmenter for appellant.
Oha/rles E. Patterson for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.