Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Carnation Co. v. Pacific Westbound Conference et al., 1965 — 380 U.S. 905 · caselaw · US
Admiralty
Carnation Co. v. Pacific Westbound Conference et al.
380 U.S. 905·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 657.
Carnation Co. v. Pacific Westbound Conference et al.
Arthur B. Dunne and James R. Baird, Jr., for petitioner. Edward D. Ransom for Pacific Westbound Conference; Herman Goldman and Elkan Turk, Jr., for Far East Conference et al.; Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Irwin A. Seibel, James L. Pimper and Robert E. Mitchell for the Federal Maritime Commission, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted.