General

Julius Rothschild, Respondent, v. Samuel Mosbacher et al., Appellants

158 N.Y. 711·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Julius Rothschild, Respondent, v. Samuel Mosbacher et al., Appellants. (Submitted March 13, 1899; decided March 21, 1899.) Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 23, 1898, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, .and an order denying a motion for a new trial. The motion was made upon the ground that no questions of law are involved in, the appeal, and that the judgment appealed from was unanimously affirmed. Rothschild v. Mosbacher, 26 App. Div. 167, appeal dismissed. Herman Aaron for motion. Reginald II. Arnold opposed. [MAJORITY] Motion to dismiss granted, and appeal dismissed, with costs.