Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Tayloe v. Merchant's Fire Ins. Co., 1850 — 50 U.S. 670 · caselaw · US
General
Tayloe v. Merchant's Fire Ins. Co.
50 U.S. 6709 How. 670·Supreme Court of the United States·1850
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Tayloe v. Merchant’s Fire Ins. Co.
(p. 390.).
[MAJORITY — Mr. Justice CATRON]
Mr. Justice CATRON
stated from the bench, that he objected to a decree being made by this court on the bill, because, the cause came here by a transfer from the Circuit Court, never having been heard there. It was only prepared for. hearing, and, is now presented and heard as an original cause in this court. We have appellate and not original jurisdiction in such cases, both by the Constitution and by the Judiciary Act of 1789. Before an appeal can be prosecuted., something must be ¡adjudged to appeal from. And in the second place, if it be once established that causes can be sent here by. mere transfer,, nothing having been décided below, we must be overwhelmed, by stich causes, there being now thirty courts and more that may send them up; This is one evil intended to be avoided by the framers of the Constitution, when ihe Supreme Court was excluded from the exercise of original jurisdiction in cases like the present.