Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. Daniel; and Local 705, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, et al. v. Daniel, 1978 — 434 U.S. 1061 · caselaw · US
General
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. Daniel; and Local 705, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, et al. v. Daniel
434 U.S. 1061·Supreme Court of the United States·1978
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 77-753.
No. 77-754.
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. Daniel; and Local 705, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, et al. v. Daniel.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 7th Cir. Motion of American Bankers Assn, for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae in No. 77-753 granted. Motions of National Association of Manufacturers, ERISA Industry Committee, National Coordinating Committee for Multiemployer Plans, American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Organizations, and Gray Panthers for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari granted, cases consolidated, and a total of one hour allotted for oral argument. Reported below: 561 F. 2d 1223.