Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Utility Users League et al. v. Federal Power Commission et al., 1968 — 393 U.S. 953 · caselaw · US
General
Utility Users League et al. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
393 U.S. 953·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 491.
Utility Users League et al. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
Harry R. Booth for petitioners.
Solicitor General Griswold, Richard A. Solomon, Peter H. Schiff, Drexel D. Journey, and Israel Convisser for Federal Power Commission, and Charles A. Bane and James E. Knox, Jr., for Commonwealth Edison Co., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 7th Cir. Motion to dispense with printing portions of appendix to petition granted. Certiorari denied.