Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Jacob Glos et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The City of Chicago, in Trust for the Use of the Schools, et al., 1912 — 226 U.S. 599 · caselaw · US
General
Jacob Glos et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The City of Chicago, in Trust for the Use of the Schools, et al.
226 U.S. 599·Supreme Court of the United States·1912
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 519.
Jacob Glos et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The City of Chicago, in Trust for the Use of the Schools, et al.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois.
Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted October 21, 1912.
Decided October 28, 1912.
Plaintiffs in error pro sese.
Mr. Angus Roy Shannon and Mn George Gillette for the defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. (Minnesota Iron Co. v. Kline, 199 U. S. 593; Howard v. Kentucky, 200 U. S. 164, 172; Tracy v. Ginsberg, 205 U. S. 170, 177-178; King v. West Virginia, 216 U. S. 92, 101; Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79.