Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Sarah M. Hazeltine, as Administratrix of Maria Barr, Deceased, Appellant, v. Mary J. Stringer et al., Respondents, 1899 — 160 N.Y. 698 · caselaw · US
General
Sarah M. Hazeltine, as Administratrix of Maria Barr, Deceased, Appellant, v. Mary J. Stringer et al., Respondents
160 N.Y. 698·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Sarah M. Hazeltine, as Administratrix of Maria Barr, Deceased, Appellant, v. Mary J. Stringer et al., Respondents.
(Argued October 9, 1899;
decided October 27,1899.)
Barr v. Stringer, 22 App. Div. 630, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Apjiellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered November 30, 1897, affirming a judgment entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term, in an action for the construction of the will of Robert S. Barr, deceased.
H. W. Coley for appellant.
C. M. Parke for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
All concur.