Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Miller v. United States, 1942 — 317 U.S. 601 · caselaw · US
General
Miller v. United States
317 U.S. 601·Supreme Court of the United States·1942
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 76.
Miller v. United States.
December 14, 1942.
[MAJORITY]
It is ordered that the opinion filed December 7, 1942, be amended as follows:
Page 3, line 4, insert a period after the word “transcribed” and strike out the balance of line 4 and all of lines 5, 6, 7, and 8, beginning with the word “that” and ending with the word “Exceptions.”
Page 5, line 3. After “4. As we have said” strike out the balance of line 3, and all of lines 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, as well as the first six words on line 9, beginning with the words “a stenographer” and ending with the word “addition.”
Page 5, last paragraph, 6th line from bottom of page. Strike out sentence beginning with the word “We” and ending with the word “foreclosed.” On the same page, 4th line from bottom, strike out the words “so” and “rule” and insert between the words “to” and “in” the following: “hold that the petitioner is foreclosed from obtaining a bill.”
Opinion reported as amended, ante, p. 192.