Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
M. J. Coventry et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. J. W. Davis et al., 1904 — 193 U.S. 668 · caselaw · US
General
M. J. Coventry et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. J. W. Davis et al.
193 U.S. 668·Supreme Court of the United States·1904
Mr. Eugene F. Ware for the plaintiffs in error.' Mr. J. D. McCleverty and Mr. W. P. Dillard for defendants in error.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 193.
M. J. Coventry et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. J. W. Davis et al.
In error to the Supreme' Court of the State of Kansas.
Submitted March 18, 1904.
Decided March 21, 1904.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, on authority of New Orleans Waterworks Company v. Louisiana, 185 U. S. 336; Sayward v. Denny, 158 U. S. 180. Case reported in state court, 65 Kansas, 557.
Mr. Eugene F. Ware for the plaintiffs in error.' Mr. J. D. McCleverty and Mr. W. P. Dillard for defendants in error.