Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mary Dochtermann, Respondent, v. The Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, Appellant, 1900 — 164 N.Y. 586 · caselaw · US
General
Mary Dochtermann, Respondent, v. The Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, Appellant
164 N.Y. 586·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary Dochtermann, Respondent, v. The Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, Appellant.
Dochtermann v. Brooklyn Heights B. B. Co., 32 App. Div. 13, affirmed.
(Argued October 8, 1900;
decided October 26, 1900.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in' the second judicial department, entered June 24, 1898, reversing an order of the Trial Term setting aside a. verdict in favor of plaintiff, and awarding a new trial, and directing judgment in favor of plaintiff upon the verdict.
Thomas L. Hughes for appellant.
8. 8. Whitehouse for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Yann and Landon, JJ.