Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Caroline K. Brennan, Respondent, v. The City of Buffalo, Appellant, 1891 — 130 N.Y. 631 · caselaw · US
General
Caroline K. Brennan, Respondent, v. The City of Buffalo, Appellant
130 N.Y. 631·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Caroline K. Brennan, Respondent, v. The City of Buffalo, Appellant.
(Argued October 6, 1891;
decided October 20, 1891.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of Buffalo, entered upon an order made March 25, 1889, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
W. F. Worthington for appellant.
¡Spencer CD/nton for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Vann and Haight, JJ., not voting.
Judgment affirmed.