Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Edward H. Hawke, Appellant, v. Madison G. Hawke et al., Respondents; Elizabeth H. Wilson, Respondent, v. Edward H. Hawke, Impleaded, etc., Appellant, 1895 — 146 N.Y. 366 · caselaw · US
General
Edward H. Hawke, Appellant, v. Madison G. Hawke et al., Respondents; Elizabeth H. Wilson, Respondent, v. Edward H. Hawke, Impleaded, etc., Appellant
146 N.Y. 366·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Edward H. Hawke, Appellant, v. Madison G. Hawke et al., Respondents. Elizabeth H. Wilson, Respondent, v. Edward H. Hawke, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.
(Argued April 15, 1895;
decided April 30, 1895.)
Appeals from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered upon an order made December 19, 1894, which affirmed a judgment establishing certain writings to be the last will and testament of Edward H. Hawke, deceased, entered upon a verdict directed by the court.
John Eoley, J. W. Houghton and J. S. E Amoreaux for appellant.
John L. Henning and Charles E. Patterson for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.