Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
HEALDTON OIL & GAS COMPANY v. Acel C. ALEXANDER, Collector, 1932 — 59 F.2d 1064 · caselaw · US
General
HEALDTON OIL & GAS COMPANY v. Acel C. ALEXANDER, Collector
59 F.2d 1064·United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
HEALDTON OIL & GAS COMPANY v. Acel C. ALEXANDER, Collector.
No. 571.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
April 12, 1932.
John E. Hughes, of New York City, for appellant.
Herbert K. Hyde, U.. S. Atty., of Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellee.
Before LEWIS and McDERMOTT, Circuit Judges, and POLLOCK, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal dismissed April 12, 1932, for want of bill of exceptions.