Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
P. J. HYLAND, Inc., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee, 1927 — 21 F.2d 1017 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
P. J. HYLAND, Inc., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee
21 F.2d 1017·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1927
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
P. J. HYLAND, Inc., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
November 17, 1927.
No. 3659.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey; Wm. N. Runyon, Judge.
Walter G. Winne, U. S. Atty., of Hackensack, N. J., and Harlan Besson, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Hoboken, N. J., for the United States.
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAYIS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.]
BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.
In the court below, after proofs furnished both by the government and the defendants, the court adjudged the premises a nuisance by reason of the proved sale of intoxicants, and ordered such nuisance abated and closed. After full consideration of the proofs, we are of opinion the decree below should'be affirmed, without prejudice to any nonresident who is not served with process making application under section 22, title 2, of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA § 34), for any relief to which she is entitled.