Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, et al., applicants, v. Angel LOPEZ-VALENZUELA, et al., 2014 — 135 S. Ct. 475 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, et al., applicants, v. Angel LOPEZ-VALENZUELA, et al.
135 S. Ct. 475190 L. Ed. 2d 355·Supreme Court of the United States·2014
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, et al., applicants,
v.
Angel LOPEZ-VALENZUELA, et al.
No. 14A493.
Supreme Court of the United States
Nov. 7, 2014.
Opinion
[MAJORITY]
UPON CONSIDERATION of the application of counsel for the applicants,
IT IS ORDERED that the issuance of the mandate of the United Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in case No. 11-16487, is hereby stayed pending receipt of a response, due on or before Monday, November 10, 2014, by noon ET, and further order of the undersigned or of the Court.