Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Auguste Struffman et al., Appellants, v. Auguste Muller, Respondent, 1878 — 74 N.Y. 594 · caselaw · US
General
Auguste Struffman et al., Appellants, v. Auguste Muller, Respondent
74 N.Y. 594·New York Court of Appeals·1878·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Auguste Struffman et al., Appellants, v. Auguste Muller, Respondent.
A motion to compel appellants’ attorney to pay costs, personally, on dismissal of appeal, cannot be made here ; it must be made in the court below after the judgment has been there entered.
(Argued May 21, 1878;
decided May 21, 1878.)
This was a motion to dismiss appeal and to compel appellants’ attorney to pay costs personally. The court granted ■. the motion to dismiss, but as to costs held as above stated.
Geo. F. Langbien for motion.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to grant motion to dismiss appeal.
Ko opinion.
Appeal dismissed.