Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Murray et al. v. Curlett et al., constituting the Board of School Commissioners of Baltimore City, 1962 — 371 U.S. 809 · caselaw · US
General
Murray et al. v. Curlett et al., constituting the Board of School Commissioners of Baltimore City
371 U.S. 809·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 119.
Murray et al. v. Curlett et al., constituting the Board of School Commissioners of Baltimore City.
Leonard J. Kerpelman for petitioners.
Francis B. Burch and Philip Z. Altfeld for respondents.
Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General of Maryland, and James P. Garland and Robert F. Sweeney, Assistant Attorneys General, for the State of Maryland, as amicus curiae, in opposition.
[MAJORITY]
Court of Appeals of Maryland. Certiorari granted.