Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Pender et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 1940 — 310 U.S. 650 · caselaw · US
Tax
Pender et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
310 U.S. 650·Supreme Court of the United States·1940
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1002.
Pender et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
June 3, 1940.
Mr. Richard B. Barker for petitioners.
Solicitor General Biddle, Assistant Attorney General Clark, and Messrs. Sewall Key, Maurice J. Mahoney, and Richard H. Demuth for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.