Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Rolando Daniel GARCIA-HERNANDEZ, aka Rolando Daniel-Garcia, aka Rolando Daniel Hernandez Garcia, aka Rolando Hernandez-Garcia, aka Rolando Daniel H. Garcia, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES; and Mario Delgado Cruz, aka Mario Delgado, aka Mario Cruz Delgado, aka Daniel Delgado, aka Mario Cruz-Delgado, petitioner, v. United States., 2018 — 138 S. Ct. 1981 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Rolando Daniel GARCIA-HERNANDEZ, aka Rolando Daniel-Garcia, aka Rolando Daniel Hernandez Garcia, aka Rolando Hernandez-Garcia, aka Rolando Daniel H. Garcia, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES; and Mario Delgado Cruz, aka Mario Delgado, aka Mario Cruz Delgado, aka Daniel Delgado, aka Mario Cruz-Delgado, petitioner, v. United States.
138 S. Ct. 1981201 L. Ed. 2d 241·Supreme Court of the United States·2018
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Rolando Daniel GARCIA-HERNANDEZ, aka Rolando Daniel-Garcia, aka Rolando Daniel Hernandez Garcia, aka Rolando Hernandez-Garcia, aka Rolando Daniel H. Garcia, petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES; and Mario Delgado Cruz, aka Mario Delgado, aka Mario Cruz Delgado, aka Daniel Delgado, aka Mario Cruz-Delgado, petitioner,
v.
United States.
No. 17-5305.
Supreme Court of the United States
May 14, 2018.
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of Sessions v. Dimaya, 584 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1204, 200 L.Ed.2d 549 (2018).