Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Christian Mosel, Respondent, v. The William H. Frank Brewing Company, Appellant, 1900 — 161 N.Y. 665 · caselaw · US
General
Christian Mosel, Respondent, v. The William H. Frank Brewing Company, Appellant
161 N.Y. 665·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Christian Mosel, Respondent, v. The William H. Frank Brewing Company, Appellant.
Mosel v. Franie Brewing Go., 13 App. Div. 99, affirmed.
(Argued January 31, 1900;
decided Febuary 16, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 14, 1897, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
M. Hallheimer for appellant.
Bernard J. Iseclce for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Martin, Vann and Werner, JJ. Not sitting: Cullen, J.