Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Fitzgerald, Public Administrator, v. United States Lines Co., 1964 — 376 U.S. 901 · caselaw · US
General
Fitzgerald, Public Administrator, v. United States Lines Co.
376 U.S. 901·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
February 17, 1964.
No. 463,
October Term, 1962.
Fitzgerald, Public Administrator, v. United States Lines Co.,
Theodore H. Friedman on the motion.
[MAJORITY]
374 U. S. 16, rehearing denied, 375 U. S. 870. The motion of petitioner to clarify opinion and to amend or modify the judgment is denied.
Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.