Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Zipes et al. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.; Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Zipes et al.; and Independent Federation of Flight Attendants v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., et al., 1981 — 451 U.S. 980 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Zipes et al. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.; Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Zipes et al.; and Independent Federation of Flight Attendants v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., et al.
451 U.S. 980·Supreme Court of the United States·1981
Justice Stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 78-1545.
No. 78-1549.
No. 80-951.
Zipes et al. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.; Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Zipes et al.; and Independent Federation of Flight Attendants v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., et al.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 7th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 450 U. S. 979.] TWA’s motion to limit review in No. 80-951 to the order of the District Court entitled “Order Awarding Seniority,” and thereafter to dismiss Nos. 78-1545 and 78-1549 as moot, is denied. Motion filed by petitioners in No. 78-1545 (the “plaintiff class”), requesting that the Court (1) grant TWA’s motion; or (2) order TWA and the plaintiff class to stipulate to dismissal of the writs in Nos. 78-1545 and 78-1549; or (3) dismiss Nos. 78-1545 and 78-1549 as moot, is denied. No. 78-1549 is removed from the argument calendar, and further consideration of the case is deferred. The writ of certiorari in No. 80-951 is limited to Questions 1 and 2 presented by the petition and is otherwise dismissed as improvidently granted.
Justice Stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.