Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Winant W. Weir, Respondent, v. Union Railway Company of New York City, Appellant, 1907 — 188 N.Y. 622 · caselaw · US
Torts · MBE-tested
Winant W. Weir, Respondent, v. Union Railway Company of New York City, Appellant
188 N.Y. 622·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Winant W. Weir, Respondent, v. Union Railway Company of New York City, Appellant.
(Argued April 30, 1907;
decided May 10, 1907.)
Weir v. Union Railway Company, 112 App. Div. 109, appeal dismissed.
Appeal from a judgment, entered April 13, 1906, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, which reversed an order of the court at a Trial Term setting aside a verdict in favor of plaintiff and of the judgment entered upon the verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through defendant’s negligence.
Charles F. Brown, Bayard H. Ames, Anthony J. Ernest, and Henry A. Bobmson for appellant.
J. Stewart Boss for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gbay, O’Bbien, Yann, Webneb, Willabd Babtlett and Chase, JJ.