Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Adolph Reich, Appellant, 1888 — 110 N.Y. 660 · caselaw · US
Criminal Law · MBE-tested
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Adolph Reich, Appellant
110 N.Y. 660·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Adolph Reich, Appellant.
(Argued June 28, 1888;
decided October 2, 1888.)
Appeal from judgment of the Gourt of General Sessions in and for the city and county of New York, entered upon a verdict convicting the defendant of the crime of murder.
The opinion is devoted mainly to a review of the testimony, the court reaching the conclusion that it fully justified the conviction.
William F. Howe and Adolph L. Sanger for appellant,
McKenzie Semple for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Finch, J.,]
Finch, J.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.