Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of The Grade Crossing Commissioners of the City of Buffalo for the Appointment of Commissioners to Ascertain the Compensation to be Paid to the Owners of and Parties Interested in Certain Lands in the City of Buffalo which May be Injured by the Change of Grade of Seneca Street. Grade Crossing Commissioners of the City of Buffalo et al., Appellants; Jacob Duchmann et al., Respondents, 1900 — 165 N.Y. 605 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Application of The Grade Crossing Commissioners of the City of Buffalo for the Appointment of Commissioners to Ascertain the Compensation to be Paid to the Owners of and Parties Interested in Certain Lands in the City of Buffalo which May be Injured by the Change of Grade of Seneca Street. Grade Crossing Commissioners of the City of Buffalo et al., Appellants; Jacob Duchmann et al., Respondents
165 N.Y. 605·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of The Grade Crossing Commissioners of the City of Buffalo for the Appointment of Commissioners to Ascertain the Compensation to be Paid to the Owners of and Parties Interested in Certain Lands in the City of Buffalo which May be Injured by the Change of Grade of Seneca Street. Grade Crossing Commissioners of the City of Buffalo et al., Appellants; Jacob Duchmann et al., Respondents.
Matter of Grade Crossing Comrs., 52 App. Div. 27, affirmed.
(Argued November 13, 1900;
decided December 4, 1900.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, made May 23, 1900, affirming an order of Special Term confirming the report of the commissioners appointed to ascertain and report the amount of compensation to be paid to the owners of and parties interested in certain lands in the city of Buffalo which may be injured by the change of grade of Seneca street.
Spencer Clinton for appellants.
John Laughlin, Seward A. Simons, Niles C. Bartholomew and George L. Kingston for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Landon, Cullen and Werner, JJ.