General
George C. Richardson et al., Appellants, v. Hiram Exstein et al., Respondents
120 N.Y. 662·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George C. Richardson et al., Appellants, v. Hiram Exstein et al., Respondents.
(Argued June 9, 1890;
decided June 24, 1890.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made January 20, 1888, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Gharries B. Wheeler for appellants.
B. Frank Bake for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur except Bradley and Haight, JJ., not sitting. Judgment affirmed.