Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People ex rel. The Eickemeyer Field Company et al., Respondents, v. Frank Rice, Secretary of State, etc., Appellant, 1893 — 138 N.Y. 614 · caselaw · US
General
The People ex rel. The Eickemeyer Field Company et al., Respondents, v. Frank Rice, Secretary of State, etc., Appellant
138 N.Y. 614·New York Court of Appeals·1893·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People ex rel. The Eickemeyer Field Company et al., Respondents, v. Frank Rice, Secretary of State, etc., Appellant.
(Argued April 10, 1893;
decided April 25, 1893.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of ■ the Supremp Court in the third judicial department, made November 22, 1892, which reversed an order of Special Term denying an application for a peremptory writ. of mandamus and granted said writ.
John W. Hogan for appellant.
J. Hampden Dougherty for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on oninion below.
All concur.
Order affirmed.