Contracts · MBE-tested

Twisp Mining & Smelting Co. v. Chelan Mining Co. et al.

320 U.S. 716·Supreme Court of the United States·1943

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

No. 213. Twisp Mining & Smelting Co. v. Chelan Mining Co. et al. December 6, 1943. Messrs. Clarence C. Dill and E. A. Cornelius for appellant-petitioner. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam:] Per Curiam: Appellant having filed a petition for rehearing and an amended jurisdictional statement which conforms to Rule 12, par. 1, the petition for rehearing is granted and the order of October 11, 1943, dismissing the appeal and denying the petition for writ of certiorari, ante, p. 705, is vacated. The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. § 237 (a) of the Judicial Code, as amended, 28 IJ. S. C., § 344 (a). The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.