Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNITED STATES v. Ora A. BENNER, 1934 — 69 F.2d 1019 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
UNITED STATES v. Ora A. BENNER
69 F.2d 1019·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES v. Ora A. BENNER.
No. 5186.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
April 21, 1934.
Paul F. Jones, of Danville, Ill., for appellant.
Ralph Jinkins and Samuel Jinkins, both of Danville, Ill., for appellees.
Before - EVANS and SPARKS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Now this day come the parties by tbeir counsel and present and file a stipulation that this appeal be dismissed, which said stipulation is in the words and figures following, to wit: “It is stipulated by and between the parties to this cause,, by their respective counsel, that the above-entitled suit which has been appealed by the United States of America and is now pending in the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit may bo dismissed.”
On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court that this appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed.