General
William F. Smith, Respondent, v. John T. Ijams et al., as Executors, etc., Appellants
141 N.Y. 552·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William F. Smith, Respondent, v. John T. Ijams et al., as Executors, etc., Appellants.
(Argued December 12, 1893 ;
decided January 16, 1894.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made May 10, 1893, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered' upon a verdict, and also affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Francis Lynde Stetson for appellants.
A.- Britton Sa/oens for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on the two grounds first mentioned in opinion of Barrett, J., below.
All concur, except Bartlett, J., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.
70 Hun, 155.