Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of the New York and North Shore Railway Company, Respondent, for a Peremptory Writ of Mandamus against Robert Grier Monroe, as Commissioner of the Department of Water Supply, Gas and Electricity in the City of New York, et al., Appellants, 1904 — 177 N.Y. 585 · caselaw · US
Corporations
In the Matter of the Application of the New York and North Shore Railway Company, Respondent, for a Peremptory Writ of Mandamus against Robert Grier Monroe, as Commissioner of the Department of Water Supply, Gas and Electricity in the City of New York, et al., Appellants
177 N.Y. 585·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of the New York and North Shore Railway Company, Respondent, for a Peremptory Writ of Mandamus against Robert Grier Monroe, as Commissioner of the Department of Water Supply, Gas and Electricity in the City of New York, et al., Appellants.
Matter of N T. & North Shore By. Go., 88 App. Div. 614, affirmed.
(Argued February 9, 1904;
decided February 23, 1904.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered November 18, 1903, which affirmed an order of Special Term granting a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel defendants to issue to petitioner a permit to erect poles and string wires necessary for the operation of its railway upon the Jamaica and Hempstead turnpike in the city of New York.
John J. Pela/ny, Corporation Gounsel (James P. Bell of counsel), for appellants.
George F. Iliclcey and William E. Stewart for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight and Martin, JJ. Not voting: Vann and Cullen, JJ.