Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Edward Freel v. Thomas T. Buckley, Appellant, James S. Feely et al., Respondents, 1883 — 92 N.Y. 634 · caselaw · US
General
Edward Freel v. Thomas T. Buckley, Appellant, James S. Feely et al., Respondents
92 N.Y. 634·New York Court of Appeals·1883·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Edward Freel v. Thomas T. Buckley, Appellant, James S. Feely et al., Respondents.
(Submitted March 20, 1883;
decided April 17, 1883.)
McGuire dc Kuhn for appellant.
John ¿7. Shorter for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Decided on opinion in Bertles v. Punan (ante, 152 ) and by the same vote.
Order of General Term, reversed. Order of Special Term modified so as to order the county treasurer to pay the whole of the surplus money in his hands to the credit of this action (after deducting $15 for the fees of the referee) to the appellant, Thomas T. Buckley.