Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ralph WIEN, Appellant, v. ALASKAN AIRWAYS, Inc., Appellee, 1930 — 45 F.2d 1023 · caselaw · US
General
Ralph WIEN, Appellant, v. ALASKAN AIRWAYS, Inc., Appellee
45 F.2d 1023·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1930
Before RUDKIN and WILBUR, Circuit Judges, and KERRIGAN, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Ralph WIEN, Appellant, v. ALASKAN AIRWAYS, Inc., Appellee.
No. 6116.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Nov. 19, 1930.
Harry E. Pratt and Louis K. Pratt, both of Fairbanks, Alaska, and Herman Weinberger, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
John A. Clark and Chas. E. Taylor, both of Fairbanks, Alaska, and Max C. Sloss, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Before RUDKIN and WILBUR, Circuit Judges, and KERRIGAN, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Counsel for the respective parties having stipulated to the court that, by reason of the death of appellant, Wien, the appeal presents no substantial matter of controversy and has become moot, it is ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed; mandate forthwith.