Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Petition of Chauncey N. Brainerd, Appellant, to Vacate an Assessment for Sewers in Tenth Avenue, East Side, Between One Hundred and Sixty-Second and One Hundred and Seventieth Streets, New York City, 1889 — 117 N.Y. 623 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Petition of Chauncey N. Brainerd, Appellant, to Vacate an Assessment for Sewers in Tenth Avenue, East Side, Between One Hundred and Sixty-Second and One Hundred and Seventieth Streets, New York City
117 N.Y. 623·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Petition of Chauncey N. Brainerd, Appellant, to Vacate an Assessment for Sewers in Tenth Avenue, East Side, Between One Hundred and Sixty-Second and One Hundred and Seventieth Streets, New York City.
(Submitted October 7, 1889;
decided October 22, 1889.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made January 28,1889, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying the prayer of the petitioner for the reduction or value of an assessment.
James A. Deering for appellant.
William H. Clark for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.