Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Federal Trade Commission v. Textile & Apparel Group, American Importers Assn., et al.; and National Knitted Outerwear Assn. et al. v. Textile & Apparel Group, American Importers Assn., et al., 1969 — 396 U.S. 910 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Federal Trade Commission v. Textile & Apparel Group, American Importers Assn., et al.; and National Knitted Outerwear Assn. et al. v. Textile & Apparel Group, American Importers Assn., et al.
396 U.S. 910·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 499.
No. 500.
Federal Trade Commission v. Textile & Apparel Group, American Importers Assn., et al.; and National Knitted Outerwear Assn. et al. v. Textile & Apparel Group, American Importers Assn., et al.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Ruckelshaus, and Robert V. Zener for petitioner in No. 499, and Eugene Gressman for petitioners in No. 500. Michael P. Daniels and Milton M. Gottesman for respondents in both cases.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.
Reported below: 133 U. S. App. D. C. 353, 410 F. 2d 1052.