Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Jones, Director, Division of Family Services of Utah, et al. v. T. H., 1976 — 425 U.S. 986 · caselaw · US
Securities
Jones, Director, Division of Family Services of Utah, et al. v. T. H.
425 U.S. 986·Supreme Court of the United States·1976
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Rehnquist would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
May 24, 1976
No. 75-624.
Jones, Director, Division of Family Services of Utah, et al. v. T. H.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from D. C. Utah. Motion of appellee for leave to proceed in jorma pauperis granted. Without indicating any views on whether the District Court’s decision on the constitutional issue was sound, judgment affirmed insofar as it invalidated the challenged regulation of the Utah Division of Family Services as inconsistent with the Social Security Act.
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Rehnquist would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.