Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Kate Setera, as Administratrix, etc., 1916 — 241 U.S. 691 · caselaw · US
General
The Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Kate Setera, as Administratrix, etc.
241 U.S. 691·Supreme Court of the United States·1916
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 238.
The Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Kate Setera, as Administratrix, etc.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State-of New York.
May 1, 1916.
Mr. Frederic D. McKenney and Mr. Harold J. Adams for the plaintiff in error. No appearance for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY]
Dismissed with costs, on motion of Mr. Frederic D. McKenney for the plaintiff in error.