Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of The Health Department of the City of New York, Appellant, v. Frederick Dassori, Respondent, Impleaded with Others, 1898 — 155 N.Y. 696 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of The Health Department of the City of New York, Appellant, v. Frederick Dassori, Respondent, Impleaded with Others
155 N.Y. 696·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of The Health Department of the City of New York, Appellant, v. Frederick Dassori, Respondent, Impleaded with Others.
Reported below, 24 App. Div. 625.
(Argued April 18, 1898;
decided April 26, 1898.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 12, 1898, purporting to amend nunc pro turne an order of the same Appellate Division entered on or about October 25,1897, reversing a judgment and granting a new trial, by inserting the words, “ on a question of fact,” ' after the words, “ ordered that the said final order and the said judgment be and the same hereby are reversed.”
The motion was made upon the ground that the order is not appealable to the Court of Appeals.
F. R. Ooudert, Jr., for motion.
John Whalen and Roger Foster opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.