Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, Plaintiff in Error v. Luisa Rivera, 1917 — 242 U.S. 622 · caselaw · US
General
The Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, Plaintiff in Error v. Luisa Rivera
242 U.S. 622·Supreme Court of the United States·1917
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 27.
The Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, Plaintiff in Error v. Luisa Rivera.
In error to the District Court qf tfié Utdted States for the District of Porto Rico.
Motion to dismiss submitted January 15, 1917.
Decided January 29, 1917.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of rule 6, paragraph 5; Nadal v. May, 233 U. S. 447, 454; Cardona v. Quinones, 240 U. S. 83, 88. Mr. Cay Coll Cuchi for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Willis Sweet for the defendant in error.