Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles G. BUDER, Appellant, v. GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA CO., 1934 — 73 F.2d 992 · caselaw · US
General
Charles G. BUDER, Appellant, v. GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA CO.
73 F.2d 992·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles G. BUDER, Appellant, v. GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA CO.
No. 10058.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
July 21, 1934.
Lee A. Hall and Myrt A. Rollins, both of St. Louis, Mo., for appellant.
William H. Allen, W. Edwin Moser, and John S. Marsalek, all of St. Louis, Mo., for appellee.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal docketed and dismissed at costs of appellant on motion of appellee and certificate of clerk of United States District Court'under Rule 16.