Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles De Kay Townsend, Appellant, v. Emma M. Work, Impleaded, etc., Respondent, 1894 — 144 N.Y. 643 · caselaw · US
General
Charles De Kay Townsend, Appellant, v. Emma M. Work, Impleaded, etc., Respondent
144 N.Y. 643·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles De Kay Townsend, Appellant, v. Emma M. Work, Impleaded, etc., Respondent.
(Argued November 26, 1894;
decided December 11, 1894.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, made June 18,1894, which affirmed an order of Special Term canceling a Us pendens filed in this action.
Mortimer 8. Brown for appellant.
Cha/rles Fox for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal: no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.